Private: Shop
View cart “VIDEO – CROSSOVER ISSUES BETWEEN DEPENDENCY AND FAMILY LAW” has been added to your cart.
Showing 161–176 of 548 results
TOPIC
VIDEO – CROSSOVER ISSUES BETWEEN DEPENDENCY AND FAMILY LAW
Category
1 hour MCLE credit Viewing Time: 62 minutes This video will discuss some of the competing issues that come up when handling the presentation of a protective parent in family law and how it can differ from representation of a parent in dependency court. This will cover some of the differences a child similarly abused and/or his/her protective parent may receive different legal treatment depending on which court he/she ends up in. Please note each video is designed for continuous viewing until its conclusion. The viewing of this online video meets the criteria for “participatory” continuing legal education credit as verified by the Sacramento County Public Law Library, an approved State Bar of California MCLE provider according to the State Bar of California MCLE Rules & Requirements [Rule 2.72].
TOPIC
A View From The Bench: Evidentiary Issues From A Judicial Perspective
Category
1 hour MCLE credit Viewing Time: 73 minutes This video presentation by Judge Curtis M. Fiorini is designed to help lawyers more easily recognize avoidable evidentiary issues and overcome those unexpected objections. A case is ultimately won or lost depending on the evidence presented. Judge Fiorini will share his views of common mistakes and misunderstandings of the Evidence Code he sees on a regular basis. Ever wonder why your objection was overruled or your opponent’s objection to your question was sustained? Many times in the heat of battle, a judge will not give an explanation and lawyers are left to wonder why. It will focus primarily on some of the more technical requirements of common hearsay exceptions and how to identify and effectively meet them. Judge Fiorini will share practical approaches to addressing some common hearsay obstacles. Please note each video is designed for continuous viewing until its conclusion. The viewing of this online video meets the criteria for “participatory” continuing legal education credit as verified by the Sacramento County Public Law Library, an approved State Bar of California MCLE provider according to the State Bar of California MCLE Rules & Requirements [Rule 2.7.2].
TOPIC
VIDEO – FOUNDATIONS OF FEHA: LEARNING THE BASICS OF CALIFORNIA’S CORE EMPLOYMENT STATUTE
Category
1 hour MCLE credit Viewing Time: 60 minutes In this video you will learn about how the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) constitutes the basis for California litigation arising from discrimination, harassment, and retaliation in the workplace. From its inception in 1959 as part of the Government Code, FEHA has been a landmark for employment-based regulations throughout the U.S. FEHA causes of action remain heavily litigated in California courtrooms. This class, which refreshes a previous FEHA class in 2018 (“May the FEHA Be With You”) will review the foundations of FEHA and its ramifications for employees and employers. We’ll highlight legislative changes to FEHA in the last two years and how the courts are still revising and modifying their interpretations of FEHA’s provisions. We’ll also examine how FEHA stays relevant in the emerging “gig economy,” in which independent contractors are a growing proportion of the labor force. Please note each video is designed for continuous viewing until its conclusion. The viewing of this online video meets the criteria for “participatory” continuing legal education credit as verified by the Sacramento County Public Law Library, an approved State Bar of California MCLE provider according to the State Bar of California MCLE Rules & Requirements [Rule 2.7.2].
TOPIC
Sexual Harassment In The Gig Economy-The More Things Stay The Same, The More They Change
Category
1.5 hours MCLE credit Viewing Time: 88 minutes The American workplace has changed dramatically in recent years. Sexual harassment has also transitioned from the old to the new workplace and beyond. Sexual harassment may occur during a Zoom meeting, after hours on Twitter or Instagram, or be perpetrated by those over whom the employer has no real control. This class will examine California and Federal practice pertaining to sexual harassment in the gig economy, where workers are increasingly cast in the roles of independent contractors or temps rather than full-time employees. Courts are striving to adapt to the new economic realities and are increasing the circumstances under which entities and individuals may be held liable. Instructors David Graulich and Kim Lucia will discuss sexual harassment from both plaintiffs’ and defendants’ perspectives. The topics will include recent cases that impact on sexual harassment in professional relationships, such as Judd v. Weinstein (9th Cir. 2020) 967 F.3d 952, the major components of California sexual harassment laws, the Fair Employment and Housing Act, and Labor Code 51.9, as well as recent changes in California statutes. Please note each video is designed for continuous viewing until its conclusion. The viewing of this online video meets the criteria for “participatory” continuing legal education credit as verified by the Sacramento County Public Law Library, an approved State Bar of California MCLE provider according to the State Bar of California MCLE Rules & Requirements [Rule 2.7.2].
TOPIC
Fraudulent Conveyance Actions
Category
1.5 hours MCLE credit Viewing Time: 81 minutes So, after months or years of litigation, you finally have a judgment. You recorded your judgment liens and try levying bank accounts, but have no luck collecting your judgment. Finally, you bring the judgment debtor in to court on an order to appear for examination. However, instead of finding assets to satisfy your judgment, you find the debtor has transferred everything years ago to a relative or a business, that is beyond the reach of your writ of execution. Judgment debtors frequently will go to such extremes to avoid paying judgments. Unfortunately, this scenario is all too common. What do you now? You are forced between giving up, and taking your first step into advanced judgment enforcement. In this video Kevin Whiteford, Partner, Serlin & Whiteford, LLP will explain the law and procedures applicable to fraudulent conveyance actions under California’s Uniform Voidable Transactions Act, Civil Code section 3439, et seq. Among the topics to be discussed are: what transactions qualify as voidable transactions; what relief is provided to a creditor under the Act; what provisional remedies are available to prevent further transfers; the elements of a claim under the Act; the applicable statutes of limitations; and who may be held liable under the Act. Please note each video is designed for continuous viewing until its conclusion. The viewing of this online video meets the criteria for “participatory” continuing legal education credit as verified by the Sacramento County Public Law Library, an approved State Bar of California MCLE provider according to the State Bar of California MCLE Rules & Requirements [Rule 2.7.2].
TOPIC
Planning for Wartime Veterans: Aid & Attendance Benefits, What You Don’t Know (WEBINAR)
Category
Photo by israel palacio on Unsplash This educational webinar is designed for licensed attorneys and members of the public who want to know …
TOPIC
VIDEO – CCP 1005 – TIMING YOUR MOTIONS AND PROPER FILING
Category
1 hour MCLE credit Viewing Time: 60 minutes This video, conducted by Judge David I. Brown, Sacramento Superior Court, Department 53 will cover CCP§ 1005. The topic will include the requirement of written notice for certain motions; Time for serving and filing; Method of serving, and related issues in law and motion practice. Please note each video is designed for continuous viewing until its conclusion. The viewing of this online video meets the criteria for “participatory” continuing legal education credit as verified by the Sacramento County Public Law Library, an approved State Bar of California MCLE provider according to the State Bar of California MCLE Rules & Requirements [Rule 2.7.2].TOPIC
Sexual Harassment in the Gig Economy-The More Things Stay the Same, the More They Change (WEBINAR)
Category
Photo by Thomas Claeys on Unsplash The American workplace has changed dramatically in recent years. Sexual harassment has also transitioned from the old …
TOPIC
VIDEO – THE EFFECTS OF PROPOSITION 19: NEW PROPERTY TAX RULES
Category
1.5 hours MCLE credit Viewing Time: 94 minutes On November 3, 2020, voters in California passed Proposition 19, which contained two (2) extremely important changes to California’s property tax reassessment rules that will impact and have profound consequences on the transfer of real property between parents and. Parents who transfer their real property to their children after the effective date of Proposition 19 will cause a property tax reassessment. Proposition 19 limits the availability of the parent-child exclusion for real property tax reassessments. The alarming aspect of this change in the law is that it takes effect on or after February 16, 2021. California real property owners who want to transfer real property to their children without property tax reassessment have approximately two (2) months to plan for those real property transfers before Proposition 19 takes effect. Proposition 19 eliminates: (i) the parent-child/grandparent/grandchild exclusion from property tax reassessment for transfers of a residence between parents and; and (ii) the transfer of $1 million of assessed value of additional real property. The other significant change in Prop 19 is generally beneficial to homeowners and takes effect on April 1, 2021. Prop 19 expands the class of people who qualify for a transfer of their taxable value from their current home to a new property. Please note each video is designed for continuous viewing until its conclusion. The viewing of this online video meets the criteria for “participatory” continuing legal education credit as verified by the Sacramento County Public Law Library, an approved State Bar of California MCLE provider according to the State Bar of California MCLE Rules & Requirements [Rule 2.7.2].
TOPIC
A View From The Bench: Evidentiary Issues From A Judicial Perspective (WEBINAR)
Category
This online webinar presentation by Judge Curtis M. Fiorini is designed to help lawyers more easily recognize avoidable evidentiary issues …Continue reading "A View From The Bench: Evidentiary Issues From A Judicial Perspective (WEBINAR)"
TOPIC
Legal Research: Part B- California Cases
Category
This class covers how California case law is developed and organized. You will learn how to locate cases in printed …
TOPIC
Understanding the Local Child Support Agency (LCSA)-Update
Category
PLEASE NOTE: TIMELINE FOR THIS MCLE PRESENTATION IS 1:30 PM TO 3:30 PM Pursuant to CA Family Code § 17400, …Continue reading "Understanding the Local Child Support Agency (LCSA)-Update"
TOPIC
Microsoft® WORD 2016: PART C – Advanced Tools
Category
This hands-on computer class will cover the advanced tools in Word 2016, focusing on Macros, AutoCorrect, creating a “Custom” Dictionary, …Continue reading "Microsoft® WORD 2016: PART C – Advanced Tools"
TOPIC
VIDEO – LIS PENDENS: A Judicial Perspective
Category
1-hour MCLE credit Viewing Time: 59 minutes This video presentation by Hon. David I. Brown, Sacramento Superior Court, Department 53, discusses Lis Pendens, a notice of pendency of action in which a real property claim is alleged. [Code Civ. Proc. §405.2] It notifies purchasers of real property of any pending court actions affecting title to or possession of real property and enables those parties to find notice of pending litigation in the recorder’s office in which the real property is located. Judge Brown covers (1) Recording requirements for a notice of pendency of action, which must be signed by the attorney of record; signed by a party acting in propria persona and approved by a judge; or the action is one of eminent domain and subject to Code Civ. Proc. §405.6. [Code Civ. Proc. §405.21] (2) Undertaking which is the condition of maintaining the notice in the recorded title, (3) Expunging a Lis Pendens, and/or (4) Withdrawal of a notice of pending action. Please note each video is designed for continuous viewing until its conclusion. The viewing of this online video meets the criteria for “participatory” continuing legal education credit as verified by the Sacramento County Public Law Library, an approved State Bar of California MCLE provider according to the State Bar of California MCLE Rules & Requirements [Rule 2.72].
Shopping cart1