
TOPIC
VIDEO – 2019: THE YEAR THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT “WORKSHOPPED” ANTI-SLAPP
Category
1-hour MCLE credit
Viewing Time: 59 minutes
Presenter: John R. Wierzbicki, a California lawyer and Co-Director of the Witkin Legal Institute
2019 was an unusual year for the California Supreme Court, which issued five Anti-SLAPP cases in less than six months. Some of these cases it had been holding on to for more than two years and every decision was unanimous. And, it still had time to hand down significant decisions on local police powers, third-party beneficiaries in contracts, tax authority of charter cities, and economic loss damages. John R. Wierzbicki, a California lawyer and Co-Director of the Witkin Legal Institute, covers these cases and what the justices were so eager to instruct us about Anti-SLAPP.
Please note each video is designed for continuous viewing until its conclusion. The viewing of this online video meets the criteria for “participatory” continuing legal education credit as verified by the Sacramento County Public Law Library, an approved State Bar of California MCLE provider according to the State Bar of California MCLE Rules & Requirements [Rule 2.72].Add to cart

TOPIC
VIDEO – LIS PENDENS: A Judicial Perspective TEST PRODUCT
Category
1-hour MCLE credit
Viewing Time: 59 minutes
This video presentation by Hon. David I. Brown, Sacramento Superior Court, Department 53, discusses Lis Pendens, a notice of pendency of action in which a real property claim is alleged. [Code Civ. Proc. §405.2] It notifies purchasers of real property of any pending court actions affecting title to or possession of real property and enables those parties to find notice of pending litigation in the recorder’s office in which the real property is located.
Judge Brown covers (1) Recording requirements for a notice of pendency of action, which must be signed by the attorney of record; signed by a party acting in propria persona and approved by a judge; or the action is one of eminent domain and subject to Code Civ. Proc. §405.6. [Code Civ. Proc. §405.21] (2) Undertaking which is the condition of maintaining the notice in the recorded title, (3) Expunging a Lis Pendens, and/or (4) Withdrawal of a notice of pending action.
Please note each video is designed for continuous viewing until its conclusion.
The viewing of this online video meets the criteria for “participatory” continuing legal education credit as verified by the Sacramento County Public Law Library, an approved State Bar of California MCLE provider according to the State Bar of California MCLE Rules & Requirements [Rule 2.72].Add to cart

TOPIC
VIDEO – UNDERSTANDING THE LOCAL CHILD SUPPORT AGENCY (LCSA)
Category
1.5-hours MCLE credit
Viewing Time: 99 minutes
In this video presentation, you will hear from Mary Clemente, Attorney with Sacramento County Child Support Services www.dcss.saccounty.net, address how Sacramento County meets the requirements of the CA Family Code § 17400. Mary will discuss the tools available to the LCSA office to enforce a child support and medical support order, such as license suspensions, bank levy, intercepts, etc. Mary will also discuss the suspension of child support orders, modifications, and registering other states’ orders. This course should give you a clear understanding of the functions of the Local Child Support Agency.
Please note each video is designed for continuous viewing until its conclusion. The viewing of this online video meets the criteria for “participatory” continuing legal education credit as verified by the Sacramento County Public Law Library, an approved State Bar of California MCLE provider according to the State Bar of California MCLE Rules & Requirements [Rule 2.72].Add to cart